CSL of the Week: Unwittingly greenlighting a simulated terrorist attack on NYC, no April Fools.

Only this past week could a sitting Vice President pull a gaffe like publicly recommending that all Americans avoid going “anywhere in confined places now” due to a potentially dangerous flu virus, and NOT win the Common Sense Loss of the Week Award.  Veep Joe Biden, well known for speaking his mind, was really doing just that (and hey, we have all thought the same thing as swine flu cases rise), the problem is that in a time of crisis a leader just cant say such things.

But say it he did, setting off a fancy tap dance routine by Press Secretary Gibbs. In any other week that common sense lapse would certainly earn top billing, but last week was an unusual week.  For those of you hiding under a rock or recovering from the flu, someone in the government hierarchy had the brilliant idea for a top secret photo-op to update the pictures of “Bush’s Air Force One” to “Obama’s Air Force One” (Like there is a difference…)  To top it all off, the photo-op was to take place a few hundred feet above New York city skyscrapers and the Statue of Liberty, in what would turn out to be a 9/11 flashback for many locals.   One has to wonder what the real reason could be  for such an insensitive operation… perhaps the presidential visitor’s brochure or “mug shot” was out of date, or maybe someone thought the Air Force One picture on Whitehouse.gov would look “sweet” with the New York City skyline in the backdrop.  Either way, the bottom line is that the whole thing was a silly idea in the first place.  Surprisingly, polarized blogs HuffingtonPost.com and MichelleMalkin.com both reacted strongly with articles demonstrating how the government could have avoided the $300k+ spent on the photo-op, not to mention the publicity nightmare, by using Photoshop for 5 minutes. (here and here).  And yes, it is possible…

Besides the ridiculous costs involved, the whole scare could have been completely avoided if someone, anyone, would have simply announced the operation 2 weeks in advance.  The Times reported that an FAA memo was released prior to the flight saying that information about the fly-by “should only be shared with persons with a need to know” and “shall not be released to the public or the media.”  So we can only assume it was classified “top secret” for some unknown reason which will probably defy common sense(HotAir). Sure, if it would have been publicized people would have almost certainly complained and called it insensitive, but at least no one would have feared for their lives.

Finding out for sure who was ultimately responsible for pushing the big green button (or coming up with the idea for that matter) is all but impossible, but Obama’s Director of the White House Military Office, Louis Caldera, did release the following semi-apology, which I can accept as an adequate response:

“Last week, I approved a mission over New York. I take responsibility for that decision. While federal authorities took the proper steps to notify state and local authorities in New York and New Jersey, it’s clear that the mission created confusion and disruption. I apologize and take responsibility for any distress that flight caused.”

The statement triggered a flurry of speculation regarding President Obama’s knowledge of the event.  What do the conspiracy theorists think, really?  That President Obama had a board meeting in mid March and said… “Now… I’m on such a roll here folks and Ive, uh… got all this public support going.  I think…uh, we should really capitalize on it.  Why don’t we, um… pull a massive prank on oh, NYC.  I feel that um, if we do it on April Fools Day, everyone will love it.  It will be a great, uh, you know… joke.“  Of course Rahm must have thought it was such a hilarious idea that they should keep it in the circle of friends as an inside joke, and push the date back to April 27th.

Come on, isn’t it silly to think any sane person would knowingly (and therefore intentionally) scare the living daylights out of the city that has already shouldered the brunt of the nation’s pain from 9/11?  I  just don’t think it is as important to crucify a person who has  already shot his career in the foot… let’s just make sure nothing like this ever happens again.  The truth is, no matter who the buck really stops with, they aren’t the only ones who lacked some common sense.  There was a whole chain of people involved, and all it takes is one responsible person, even if it comes down to the pilot of the fighter jet.  He can say to his supervisor at any time: “Hey, so… isn’t this whole thing kinda… cruel?” or maybe even simply “do New Yorkers realize we are going to be doing this, because it could look pretty bad…“  And I think there probably were a few people who saw the big picture and had some doubts.  Its too bad that no one had the guts to speak up, because believe me, if you were the link in the chain who pulled the plug on this public relations nightmare you would be getting a nice pat on the back from Obama right now, just for saving his butt.  It is worth mentioning that Obama has initiated a review to find out who was responsible, so he appears to be genuinely concerned.  At the end of the day, It  turned out to be a mostly harmless, albeit cruel and insensitive, mistake. (It really could have been worse – fortunately those New Yorkers are a resilient and level-headed bunch, they knew what to do).

Basically,  some people at the top in Government suffered a severe brain fart, and the people who may have paused to think of the negative results… well, they kept their mouths shut.  After virtually no deliberation, the Common Sense Loss of the Week Award goes to whoever actually authorized the photo-op (tba), because lets face it, it was an extreme lapse of judgment and good sense.

Moral of the Story: When planning any high profile government exercise, like say; having a fighter jet chase the Air Force One just above one of the most populous city in the world,  remember that everyone is going to know about it… so you have to use your head.

unCommon Sense: Torture Abuse?

With the release of the CIA interview today claiming water boarding saved American lives, and Obama suggesting he might prosecute such actions, we all have a fresh new hypothetical moral dilemma to mentally chew on.  I think most people can agree that there is some point at which everyone supports the use of aggression as a peace keeping tool.  Where each of your friends, coworkers, and family draw that line depends on their past experience and worldview, and no one will ever unanimously agree on where that point is.  Maybe for some it is when a cop is forced to shoot a criminal who is attacking a defenseless citizen.  It might even be when a strong country is obligated to help a defenseless country resist an aggressive and hostile neighbor.  Maybe for some that line is never drawn until they are personally attacked in some manner.

For me, whenever I hear one of these moral dilemmas that people love to use to put you on the spot, I generally approach the question by looking at the worst case scenario.  In this particular case I would say that the potential loss of even one single innocent American citizen’s life trumps a *proven radical jihadist getting some water up his nose.  But does that make torture ok, even a form of torture that is (slightly) more civilized than its gory predecessors?   The answer is: I don’t know and neither do you, because like every hypothetical dilemma you’ve ever heard, it can only be realistically addressed in the “moment of truth” by whoever is in the position of authority.  This decision maker must carefully consider the big picture and the small picture, weigh all the pros and cons, and make a really tough call.

Take torture and aggression completely off the table and Americans face a potentially devastating and possibly avoidable worst case scenario. Make torture and aggression something only used in the most extreme and dangerous situations, requiring approval from the president himself, and we enable our highest elected office to make the tough decisions that come with the job of protecting the free world.

*Proven meaning authentic evidence of crimes against the United States.

UPDATE:  Michelle Malkin has a nice summary of the entire torture circus, and evidence that the public is more in tune with Dick Cheney’s stance than the current administration’s stance.  HotAir also uncovered a compelling article – buried by WaPo – that suggests the torture memos were released in response to Cheney’s original criticisms that Obama was endangering the US with lax security policies.  Talk about your all-time biggest backfire…